Posts Tagged ‘3.5 stars’

Guilty at the Rapture

Tuesday, October 24th, 2006

by Keith Taylor
Hanging Loose Press 2006
Reviewed by Matt Soucy

3_5

Stick to the Prose

guilty at the raptureKeith Taylor’s new book Guilty at the Rapture is not a very exciting collection of verse.  However, definitely worth a read are Taylor’s prose poems, which contain both good storytelling and the subtleties you might hope to find in any decent book of poetry.

The title poem tells of the relief Taylor would find at being left alone with the damned on Judgment Day.  Taylor remembers himself as a young boy whose life was all misbehavior and guilt in an intense rural upbringing suffused with Christian values.  The poem is humorous and unburdened, offering clear insight and solid “telling.”  American Christian conservatism continues as the focus throughout the first set of poems. 

Unfortunately, other than “Guilty at the Rapture,” the poem-poems don’t hold many kicks. Those that begin with promising intrigue and intelligence, such as, “The Stud: Galahad, Alberta, 1927,” tend to fall flat in their closing lines.  Taylor seems to focus mostly on drawing pictures with his verse, but he makes the images too available to be of much use.  In “Grandmother Triptych” he writes:

We remember her black dresses
shining like Bibles, her hand
moving lightly over our backs and arms…

Lines like these seem on the verge of some insight or image that would reframe everyone’s concept of something familiar—in this case, Grandma—in a new and sympathetic way.  Unfortunately most of the poems do not go the distance.

After reminiscing about his Christian upbringing, Taylor introduces the prose poems.  Anyone interested in the poetry world would probably thoroughly enjoy “First Reading.”  In the piece, Taylor sneaks into a James Dickey reading and watches him sweat, swear, and offend almost everyone in the auditorium: “The nuns in the front row, who had been getting more and more agitated for half an hour, were obviously upset. Several left.” 

Where Taylor’s verse lacks punch, “First Reading” steps in with a laugh-out-loud conclusion. With similar strength, the close of the short story/prose poem “A Foreign Language” is both meaningful and effective.  Taylor adeptly closes with the human condition of holding singular, contradictory desires: “I didn’t want his mother to tell me that I had stayed too long in her rented garage.  Most of all, I didn’t want her to tell me that I had left too early.” That Taylor’s prose can convey this unexpected duality highlights what is absent from his verse.

Thus I find myself wishing that later pieces of verse, like “Hitchhiking,” had been written in prose.  Taylor’s efforts to tell stories in the more digested and concise format miss the mark almost every time.  One exception is “My Education in Paris” which catalogues the women who turned Taylor down without his even propositioning them:

A young Persian woman whose name meant “little white
flower that grows in the desert” – at least that’s what she
told me and I wanted to believe her – said she wouldn’t
sleep with me because I was too old.

I was 22 and I hadn’t asked her either.

A French woman I did ask said she was very pleased but she preferred women.

Wherever Taylor uses this self-effacing humor he makes an impressive connection to the reader that is personal and unpretentious, and is as memorable as his anecdotes in prose.  Unfortunately, the bulk of his verse is not nearly vivid enough to stand out for either its observation or its construction.

*


Eastern Mountain Time

Sunday, June 4th, 2006

by Joyce Peseroff
Carnegie Mellon University Press 2006
Reviewed by Melinda Wilson

3_5

Beyond Fear of the Maker

peseroff cover

In Joyce Peseroff’s fourth collection of poetry, Eastern Mountain Time, mushrooms are imagined as flying saucers that have landed after a space-storm, a fallen leaf moved by wind is thought to be a wounded mouse, and certain lilacs are deemed “famously sad.” 

The imaginative leaps taken in Peseroff’s book are easy to run with; in fact they are well-calculated and mostly seamless.  However, her poems ask too much of the reader when Peseroff indulges in excessive description and over-extended similes.  Her speaker compares herself to a Monarch:

…the globe of rusty pink milkweed

essential nectar for a jade, transparent

chrysalis…

When Peseroff’s poems are not overly descriptive they are, more often than not, lacking in vibrancy.  The title poem of the collection is especially unexciting with the repetition of the line “then nothing.” 

Peseroff writes best about death and animals.  In “The Ridge” she questions death’s motives as if death were a being with intention:

…why does extinction need

to demonstrate variety, nuance, its grip

on arteries, the worthlessness of lungs?

Often though, her struggles with death and the “maker,” are reconciled in a sweet and calming fashion. She presents death not as a finality, but as a transformation, “…swift erratic heart, a humming- / bird about to meet the lily’s bliss.”  In “The Knock” she presents death as a normality, thereby depriving it of its assumed power or dominance.  Death is as regular as preparing a pot of stew. 

In “Killings,” one of her most successful poems, Peseroff’s speaker ponders whether or not she is capable of killing a chicken.  She believes she could and wonders what tool she would use.  She goes on to remember all the animals that she has killed in her lifetime.  She mentions a four-pound salmon that was the brightest thing she had killed.  The poem is provocative, turning death and killing into something bright and desirable. 

The poem “Natural Light” creates a sense of serenity beginning with its title.  The poem recreates an orchard scene that has been ravished by the mice that owls hunt and grow fat off of: 

…stars

unrolling like an opera score for owls,

crickets, and skinny, long-legged frogs.

 Though the poem can seem stark, it is peaceful and refined, a good example of one of Peseroff’s greatest strengths, the calm atmosphere her poems often create.

*


Burn the Field

Saturday, May 6th, 2006

by Amy Beeder
Carnegie Mellon University Press 2006
Reviewed by John Deming

3_5

The Flavor of Chance

beeder coverAmy Beeder’s debut is promising, but she’d do well to lay off the flowers a little. A highly observational book of poetry, Burn the Field occasionally gropes for subject matter, but has a great deal of sophistication and many surprising lines. Beeder’s at her best when she submits to her most absurd impulses. In “Cabezon,” one of the book’s better poems, she watches a stranger “shuffle up Washington street” as she drives by:

hands in your pockets, a smoke dangling slack
from the slit of your pumpking mouth;
humped over like the eel-man or geek
the dummy paid to sweep out gutters,
drown the cats. Where are you going now?

In this poem, the narrator sees something and meditates upon it. There are a number of poems like this, and many are good, but also read like “show-and-tell.”

 Beeder’s absurdity can be a treat, and when their fusion with the book’s recurring themes and images yield the most promise.  Two of the book’s best poems are among a handful involving roosters, the first of which is “Rooster Shadow.” The poem illustrates Beeder’s excellent ear: “and grackle black, grit-colored slivers of sparrow/or finch that grub for crumbs on every sidewalk.” And “The Cockfight” shows a dark side she may want to indulge a bit more:

                                      …When the victor
climbed the corpse and spread his wings
and crowed—a long triumphant crow, we fled
from that plank court into a rainy street
winnings in our hands…

 There’s also an intimacy with nature in Burn the Field that, at times, pays dividends: “When Heaven spoke through nature any cabbage/might show a rupture in the Human sphere.” But a lot of the book’s less exciting poetry comes when she gets a little too gushy about flowers and trees. This is where her show-and-tell description pays off the least.  When it does work, however, it’s worth it, as in her short meditation on a “Photo of Pasteur”:

Up to his neck in beet juice & the favor of chance
with a crookneck flask, the man who, attending a lecture
on childbed fever at the Paris Academy
sprung up impatient, shouting—

 I recommend the book and I think Beeder is skilled enough to hang around for a while;  lines like these show how much fun she’d be if she’d just indulge her cues toward mania.

*