Posts Tagged ‘4 stars’

Grace

Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006

by John Hodgen
University of Pittsburgh Press 2006
Reviewed by Jason Bredle

4

Safe

hodgen cover

John Hodgen’s Grace is a fine selection for the AWP Award Series—a collection of well-crafted meditations on life for the conservative democratic demographic from the perspective of a Massachusetts adjunct professor of English. In short, poems from an All-American poet, your next door neighbor, a guy content to sit back and describe the world as happens somewhere out there, occasionally missing his father and longing for youth, a guy who dislikes war and racism. Could you really expect that much? But I *like* racism, you may be thinking. Then this book isn’t for you.

But this book is for you if you long for a childhood passed, sometimes miss your father, or ever feel alone in this mixed up world of ours. In fact, Hodgen strikes me as the type of guy with whom I could sit down and chit chat about life and walk away feeling pretty okay, which makes the poems in Grace all the more frustrating. I want to like them, I want to walk away feeling pretty okay, but ultimately, I walk away feeling completely gray, wishing more stimulating things would happen to the guy so that he could write more stimulating poems. 

But he doesn’t, so we have to work with what he’s given us: grace. What constitutes the idea of grace according to Hodgen? The dedication to Grace Taylor aside, the book’s opener, “Clay County,” presents it as lonely, like a “slender roan horse” in a “buckwheat field,” or a single black girl talking to a young man on a motorcycle in her driveway. In “This Moon, These Fifty Years,” grace is also a lonely soul, this time in the form of the speaker’s father, who arrives home from work each night to the delight of his sons only to sit in his car for a few moments before walking into the house. Hodgen’s grace also serves as prayer, coming to us “wordless, like stones.” In fact, one commendable aspect of the book is its ability to address the spiritual without delving into the religious: “I have seen this today,” writes Hodgen in “On a Wing,” “my makeshift prayer: a man in a torn serape/ who pumped my gas and looked like my long-lost brother.” Here and elsewhere, common, every day images and situations take on an aura of graceful spirituality without leaving the realm of observation and meditation.

And the poems are delivered ever so gracefully, each moment captured and extrapolated with only the utmost care, from the effortless falling in “For the Leapers” to the “schoolchildren alighting from their yellow ships” in the unfortunately titled “The Oldest Lie,” a contemplation of the violence and senselessness of the slave trade and perhaps the most powerful and vivid poem in the book due to its realism, darkness, and ultimate beauty.

Yet too often Hodgen over-saturates his work with “the poetic,” especially with regard to  metaphors. In “For Freedy, and for the Ohio Dragging Itself Dead,” for instance, death is likened to “a riderless horse, the last clown in the car,/ the 8 a.m. barber reading his paper alone in his silver gray chair,/ Lincoln locked up in the dark each night at the Lincoln Wax Museum” all in one small stanza. Too often Hodgen panders to his demographic, relying heavily on quirky names to provide the detail of his poems, to get a broad chuckle from his like-minded audience, as in the “Klip N’ Dip” and “Pitchkettle Road” of “Clay County” or the “jalopies” in “Lost Bird.” (I even counted two non-ironic uses of “jumpin’ jehosaphat”).  Occasionally, too, Hodgen takes the easy way out of a poem, going either for the evocation of his dead father, sitting in a “driveway up in heaven” or in the “tall grass in heaven,” or opting for a cute play on words, as with the supermarket cans of Goya in “Today.”

While one cannot question the care that went into these poems, one can’t help but feel unchallenged by the subject matter. Yes, Hispanics were undercounted in the census and that sucks; a Latin American man fell to his death attempting to enter the US from the wheel well of an airplane and that sucks even more; and thousands upon thousands of Africans were forced to drown and that’s just terrible, but so what? How does it affect the speaker? Well, he observes them, creates a broad generalization on the matter, then steps outside to mow the lawn before falling asleep in front of the television, most likely. His images are beautiful enough—but what now? Perhaps the challenge Hodgen had in mind was up to the readers, perhaps the challenge is to take these news clippings and think about their relationship to our daily lives, but if so, the challenge is garbled and lost amongst the metaphors and cute phrases, amongst the tragedy that Hodgen observes in the death of his friend’s daughter, the passing of his own father, the longing for his childhood—events that seem to only vaguely happen to the him as he floats gracefully through each day.

*


Official Versions

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006

by Mark Pawlak
Hanging Loose Press 2006
Reviewed by Mike McDonough

4

Relaxed Fit

pawlak coverThe centerpiece of Mark Pawlak’s Official Versions is a five-part poem called “Hart’s Neck Haibun,” a travelogue in prose and verse about vacationing in Tenant’s Harbor, Maine.  The poem combines found material and personal observations in ways that will appeal to fans of the New York and Black Mountain staples: it takes Ted Berrigan’s playful borrowing from fondly-remembered sources, blends some appropriately local found material with some precise natural observation, and seasons it with more than a dash of Blackburn’s wry wit.  Olson’s text map of the soundings in Gloucester Harbor is transformed into the names and positions of boats anchored in Tenants Harbor. Many passages I could cite show an appealing directness and humor.  Here’s the entry for August 4:

Additions to the catalog of breezes:
wrinkle-free breeze
relaxed fit breeze
permanent press breeze
wash-and-wear breeze
pressed & creased breeze.

Mark Pawlak’s work is as comfortable as broken-in denim.  We relate to the lobstermen firing up their motors at dawn, even if the noise wakes us up.  We can visit Elmer’s Barn, an eccentric antique store down by Cooper’s Mills.  The recipe is surprisingly easy, and the journey is so relaxing that I have to remind myself that Blackburn, Olson, and even Berrigan were more edgy than these fond, almost nostalgic tributes admit; once in a while though, everyone has to go on vacation.

Another sequence in the book exposes the continuing ironies of American foreign and domestic policy.  Pawlak’s “East West Dialogue 2002,” between a Russian and American worker concerning similarities between the perks of former Communist leaders and deposed corporate CEO’s, is dramatized in semi-vaudevillean fashion.  For the most part, he lets the constantly spun language of White House stage managers and newspaper reports reveal itself with a minimum of additional comment.  One of the best political poems in the book is “Capsule History of Herat, Afghanistan.” Each of the poem’s three stanzas describe another governmental takeover, and each ends with a variation on the women of Herat dressed in burkas, watching silently through narrow eye slits. “Historical Afterward” is a passage from T.E. Lawrence deploring the British administration of Iraq, each line of which is crossed out with a thin horizontal line. 

I found myself unable to argue with his tone and sentiments, pretty much throughout the whole book. In fact, I never got beyond vaguely annoyed.  I can’t help but think of this as a fault, knowing that I am rather politically complacent.  Pawlak dedicates poems to Boondocks’ creator Aaron McGruder, Doonesbury creator Garry Trudeau, and visual artist Barbara Kruger. I find each of those artists more challenging in their chosen medium than Mark Pawlak.

*


Astoria

Monday, October 16th, 2006

 by Malena Mörling
University of Pittsburgh Press 2006
Reviewed by Melinda Wilson

4

Dead All Over 

 morling cover

Malena Mörling’s opening poem in Astoria, “If There is Another World,” is the best in the book.  In it the speaker explores the many worlds that exist within the one world we all live in, concluding that we don’t need to leave this world to find another, and that we certainly shouldn’t wait until death to do so:

Especially since there is a kind of moth
here on earth
that feeds only on the tears of horses.
Sooner or later we will all cry
from inside our hearts.

Who knew? This odd and charming fact coupled with the last two seriously reflective lines make for impressive lyric. With this poem of inspiration and assurance as the opener—one might even see it as a call to action—I expected more in the same vein, but things only got darker. And though the opening poem deals with death to some extent, it does more for the cause of living than it does to examine the possibility of an afterlife. Quickly though, death becomes the subject of and motive for Mörling’s poems.

But before Mörling delves into the aphotic zone she has a short poem called “A Story”(followed by one called “Becoming a Coat” which I mention only because at first glance I read it as “Becoming a Goat” which of course would be a million times better). “A Story” deals with what we hide from the world, our secrets, rather than what the world hides from us—or more accurately, what we are often too ignorant to find. I bring up this poem for the sake of discussing one incredible image:

the rats you once saw standing
on their hind legs
at the dump
late in the dark.

Though I can’t help but picture Templeton here, what interests me most about the lines is what is left untold. What was the unnamed “you” doing in the dump, late and in the dark? That’s the secret, and what is left to be imagined is undoubtedly the most interesting part.

Now, back to death. In “A Wake,” Mörling details a conversation with a friend who has just been to a wake. The friend sounds happy, content with the way his dead friend looked—and beyond that, content with the way he left this world. He explains the deceased was an alcoholic that, despite a number of attempts to give up drinking, always returned to it and ultimately chose his own end. There is something to be said for controlling death in this way, some appeal that comes with power, though by the poem’s end even the speaker doesn’t sound satisfied. She brings up a take on death familiar from Lorca—that it’s a beginning instead of an end, a true celebration. By now, the idea of death as a celebration, though encouraging, is far too conventional to be inspiring. 

Early on in the collection is a poem called “Wearing a Death.” Like “A Wake,” this poem is familiar and too predictable. The idea is permissible, but the approach is fair at best. The whole poem is in the title; we wear death like an accessory despite its inevitability. The wordplay in this poem is perhaps the most inconvenient for the reader: “Not the sole of a shoe, a soul.”

I don’t mean to give the impression that Mörling can’t or doesn’t succeed with the Death Poem. She does and sometimes in the most difficult fashions. One example is “Traveling.” Here is the first stanza of this two stanza poem:

Like streetlights
still lit
past dawn,
the dead
stare at us
from the framed
photographs.

Eerie. You may say it’s been done before and you’d be right, but it’s done well here. The streetlights still lit past dawn take on a sort of extraterrestrial life, and I turn all the photographs in my apartment face down for the day. The idea that the dead are still traveling through time makes death more appealing somehow; death might be interesting if we get to see what happens next.

Mörling is best when she takes death and doesn’t worry about the fact that it is an overwrought topic to begin with, when she just lets it consume her. This is when the refreshing lyric is formed. Too often her speaker is predictable, fearful of death and overcompensating with bravery—like Jack in “Above the Expressway” who nobly wishes to be thrown into ocean when he dies so the fish can eat him. When Mörling is able to look at death from afar, when she’s vague and mysterious about lifelessness and the fact that she’s still living, her verse is most stunning:

There are shadows of scarecrows on the earth
that rise at noon
and vanish into the wilderness
of their own hearts.

 *


My Brother is Getting Arrested Again

Wednesday, September 27th, 2006

by Daisy Fried
U. of Pittsburgh Press 2006
Reviewed by David Sewell

4

So What?

fried coverThere’s no doubt that Daisy Fried’s second book, My Brother Is Getting Arrested Again, will be warmly received by the seven people in America who still read poetry these days (disclosure: I’m not one of them). And—to prove that this review isn’t being dictated straight from my subconscious to a clairvoyant Mayan child-cum-secretary née cast-off from Mel Gibson’s upcoming romantic comedy Apocalypto—the book was, in fact, a finalist for the 2005 James Laughlin Award, which, apparently, is some sort of scheme the not-completely sozzled contingent at the Academy of American Poets cooked up to snooker authors with two books in the sack into accepting a lock of the late publisher’s well-connected hair. I realize, then, that, by writing the following review, I’m risking damnation, or at least less brandy in my sidecar at the next Academy mixer. Yet, a decent swimmer me, I’ll continue.

Fried has a talent for writing highly readable lyrical poetry that, in the words of fictitious movie drunk Arthur Bach, doesn’t suck. Fine. But what about the tops of those seven heads filled with poetry (see above)? Might we inquire how they’ll fare? Well, they’re safe, I’d say. Neither form nor content is being pushed very far in this book. Likely, a pleasant afternoon will be passed in the company of these poems, but few lives will be changed or bothered much by them.

Fried, with a refreshing lack of concern for the dryness of her simple shoes, does wade often into the ebb tide of childhood and adolescence. From there, she reports on and inhabits the types of characters that, according to Fried, dwell in that realm. Too often, though, there’s not much new to be uncovered, unless you think a by-the-numbers description of an adolescent boy (which is the whole of the poem “First Boyfriend, 14”) is uncharted territory. (Okay, she does compare him to a minotaur; but too little, too late.)

Fried bravely pays much effort to making her scenes vivid. She seems to prefer the eye of the painter or filmmaker—we see the concern for lighting à la, say, Edward Hopper, “Sunlight gaps into the room” (“Go to Your Room”), as well as concern for the most niggling details: “Her eyelash brush has left / its own celestial smudge over one brow” (“Broken Radios”) or “oldtimey accordion music / on the back-wall jukebox, its sliding lights, / heatless not-hearth blinking against sapped / north latitude winter window sun” and “The man / in dirty suede” (The Drunkard’s Bar”). The idea must be that all these details amount to something—some reflection of life today, its obsessions and devotions, its predilections and variations, to help us make sense of how her characters and personalities fit into and navigate such a world, and, therefore, to gain a better, at least different, understanding of these our modern times for ourselves. But, too often, there’s the feeling that these details are irrelevant or not much more than ballast.

Admittedly, most of the poems feature fairly well sketched-out scenes (as the above quotations indicate) in which fairly well sketched-out characters talk and act and interact. That said, the poems, while mostly well executed, seem a bit too easy-listening, at least for me, my expectations, and my fourteen dollars. 

Her attempts at political poems are a different story—at best, they’re regrettable. “The Hawk,” a response to the renewal of the Patriot Act, did not have to be written, and its inclusion is the closest the book ever came to causing me any sort of consternation. The poem doesn’t quite achieve what the idea seems to require, and it wasn’t a very strong idea to begin with. (Take a guess what/who the hawk stands for; a dove appears later in the book, multiplying into nine or ten doves—all of which is, I think, a little heavy-handed, obvious, and lacking in artfulness.)

The “Hawk” poem is both inaccurate (why, for instance, call the hawk’s squirrelly meal “plunder”?) and, in a strange twist, unfairly hard on males: the poem features a male tourist who “grabs” at his wife’s “wrist knobs” and “gabbles a strange language, transfixed”; a little boy who is willing to break his mother’s fingers (which are trying to lead him away) to see the bird eat its meal (the bird has alighted on a monkey bars of all places—get it?); and a man—an ex-hunter, whatever that is—who practically salivates at the scene. Weird.

The other overtly political poem, “American Brass,” takes too long to dramatize that the speaker has conflicted feelings about being an American in a foreign country. This speaker is in France, watching an American high school marching band at the same time that the bombing of Afghanistan is beginning (a fact that’s reinforced by the spineless inclusion of the relevant dates [one just pre- and one just post-9/11] at the end of the poem, though the fact is fairly clear at that point). The poem is mostly clumsy and doesn’t really pass the “So what?” test—it certainly doesn’t stand up to the terrible events of 9/11, which is a risk every artist runs and few, if any, have avoided.

What else? There’s a poem (“Three Times Only”) about the instances in which she has seen her husband cry, yet there’s nothing particularly poignant or memorable in the poem. And there’s one about how, once, when waiting for the Metro, vexed by extreme heat and heavy shopping bags, she remembers a time when she was ten and saw a train that was lit up on the inside and didn’t stop. (The poem is called “In a Station of the Metro.” Hmm. Remakes rarely work. Though, at least she didn’t name one, “The Waste Land.”) The poem then tortures syntax to arrive at the point (I think) that the train represents for her “inexorability’s ease,” and she knows she can never get on that train. Uh, okay.

There are better poems in the book. “Doll Ritual”—which introduces the character/doll Ti-Anne, who/which reappears in the book, though not quite enough—is strange and exciting. The poem is one of the many from the perspective of a child, and one of the few that works. (The same tactic doesn’t work as well in “Jubilate South Philly: City 14” and “Running while Screaming,” for instance.) “Envy” takes chances and pays off, and “The Conference Notes” is a complicated and rewarding slide show of a longer poem.

But, ultimately, I’m left thinking about the poems that widely miss the mark. In the poem “Used One Speed, Princeton,” in which the speaker lets her mind wander while she tools around on her bicycle, we get this: “The houses dim, colors of soap, the shaped kind / you put in little dishes, that shrink and melt / to goo.” And the interestingly titled “Pablo Picasso Was Never Called an Asshole” quickly loses steam: “Clubs like erections / locked down over their steering columns.” On the other hand, the book’s cover art is delightful. 

*


Crooked Run

Sunday, June 4th, 2006

by Henry Taylor
Louisiana State University Press 2006
Reviewed by Melinda Wilson

4

Bearded with Muddy Grass

crooked runHenry Taylor’s eighth book of poetry Crooked Run—the winner of the L.E. Phillabaum Poetry Award—both begins and ends with the speaker walking the land that his family lived on for more than four generations. The second and final poems in the book are entitled “Creek Walk.” The first details the life of animals on the land and the second details their deaths on the same, how “the open jaws might appear to say/ we all must find our hard deathbeds.” These poems sandwich the life and stories of Taylor’s family on the land and, what’s most intriguing, what happens in between.

Taylor, a Pulitzer Prize winner for his book The Flying Change, introduces his characters as if we’ve known them for years. We meet Uncle Will, the Hatchers, Mr. Clark, and William Valentine among others. Each of these characters has stories in connection with the same land. Often Taylor’s speaker talks about his attempts as a young man to impress his grandfather. The speaker is frequently self-deprecating and regretful, for example, in “Snapshots”– “wanting, as always in his presence,/ to do right, I made some lame reply.”

Most of the stories these poems tell are funny, witty, and light-hearted, though Taylor does not shy away from revealing some darker happenings. In “Summer Hill” he tells the story of a man who allows Mr. Clark to sleep with his young daughter in exchange for money. He also takes the perspective of perhaps his Great Grandmother or a Great Aunt, and writes of the destruction of the land during the American revolution. The poem “My Dear Sister Hannah,” takes the form of a letter. The poem is full of dramatic language and at times seems self-indulgent:

I despise the rebels more than ever
for causing this awful mess.
Some weak-minded people will perhaps
be more [illegible] after this

Taylor’s shorter poems are often restricted by their rhyme schemes, as in “A Trace of Old Road Work,” which is made up of three rhyming quatrains. The rhymes of the first quatrain are off-rhymes and awkward compared to the final two stanzas’ perfect rhymes. The poem sets up a nice scene that speaks to the age-old battle between nature and humankind, but Taylor allows the speaker to dominate the final line of the poem, “it stands where I can show it to you still.” What makes the poem so nice prior to the last line is the near-absence of the speaker.

The longer poems, given time to fully develop, are Taylor’s most effective. The best poems in the book are those that are almost entirely imagined, as in “George Washington’s Farewell to His Hounds.” The retelling of the farewell is an obviously emotional story, but Taylor avoids melodrama by incorporating dialogue:

“I can’t help thinking he must of cast those hounds
a few times on his way up to the ferry.
Start one more fox.”

“Boy Hunting in Bog” is another exceptionally imaginative poem. The speaker imagines his Uncle as a boy combing through the marsh for bullfrogs and snapping turtles. The poem is emotive, but not overbearing and ends with the speaker imagining his dead Uncle as a boy:

…I still see him walking
with a heron’s slow stride, pure attention,
not quite of this world, but deep in it.

*


For Love of Common Words

Monday, May 15th, 2006

by Steve Scafidi
Louisiana State University Press 2006
Reviewed by John Deming

4

Death-Obsessed

for love of common  wordsWhen I first flipped through Steve Scafidi’s new book and saw a thin poem titled “Ode to the Middle Finger,” I figured I didn’t even have to read it to know it was going to be what most novelty poems are: brainless sludge.

Surprisingly, the poem wound up being a genial elegy to Johnny Cash. And it’s even more surprising, later in the book, to see he also wrote an elegy for Run DMC DJ Jam Master Jay. This is characteristic of For Love of Common Words; just when Scafidi seems to have settled on an aesthetic; a form; a temperament; whatever; he turns a surprising corner. This accounts for the bulk of the book’s successes.

For Love of Common Words is the second book for Scafidi, a cabinetmaker from West Virginia. The first of three sections includes his poem “The Egg Suckers,” which won the 2005 James Boatwright Prize from Shenandoah. Part One seems nearly a constant celebration, and “The Egg Suckers” is among its better poems. In the section, he goes to no lengths to hide his romantic side. He writes well about animals, which is nothing if not “pleasant”—especially in the opening poem, in which “Mr. Garland Calhoun, an ordinary bear/eight foot tall with top hat” makes his way to a wedding. Sounds like a child’s poem, but by the end of the book (or this review), one comes to see it has greater implications.

Scafidi has an affinity for current events, particularly horrifying ones, and the terrified, death-obsessed narrator that emerges in parts two and three gives his first scare during “The Boy in the Pumpkin,” the penultimate poem in Part One. The poem describes a boy found dead inside the remains of a destroyed prize pumpkin. But “On the Death of Karla Faye Tucker” is even more horrific; in the poem, the narrator is morally stricken about whether or not to it’s appropriate to celebrate the death of an enemy:

                     …For Texas just killed a woman
    who took a pick ax for a while against
                     gravity and swung it
    down into the curled body of another
woman trying to sleep—just to sleep—one night
and who begged after a while more to be killed
                quicker and who was not…

At the end of the poem, he admits, “Karla Tucker was not my enemy./Horror is. That common murderous evil bitch.” So it becomes all the more interesting in “Implement and Icon” when which he makes the following confession:

I’ve needed to write about this for a long time—
      this pitchfork motionless here in the mind—
full of rage these days, full of murderous rage.

But if Scafidi shows an appropriate level of terror in the book, he occasionally indulges his romantic side a bit too much. One very good poem is spoiled by a clichéd last line which explains that one can live one’s whole life in America “and never learn how to love or how to be a man.” But his sharp sounds, rhythms and sense of grandiosity tend to make up for these slips. Toward the end of the book, as Scafidi’s formal concerns increase, nearly every poem mentions death by name, and cold horror finds balance in an imaginative world he’s able to access through his infant daughter—a world of faithless hope, and of fairy tale (he holds her in his arms and growls like a bear, perhaps Mr. Calhoun). At last, he explains to his daughter that night is “an idiot and blind, bigger/than your mother and I and we defy it with you.”

*