Posts Tagged ‘Alice Notley’

Culture of One

Tuesday, November 29th, 2011

by Alice Notley
Penguin Books 2011
Reviewed by Diana Arterian

“my smoothing wilderness of righteousness”

Alice Notley puts forth work of quality at a startling clip – about thirty books in forty years, with each volume of poems markedly different from the previous. She won me over with Descent of Alette (1996), which I happily discovered organically after reading her notes on her late husband Ted Berrigan’s Sonnets, then her At Night The States, and finally Coming After: Essays on Poetry, in which she includes her lecture on the feminine epic and what inspired Alette. Like Alette, Culture of One is a book-length poem—“a novel in poems,” as Penguin advertises—with a female protagonist. Visually, the book is dense—multiple poems on each page, four to five long-lined stanzas. With this form, Notley explores the potential narrative of an actual woman, Marie, who resided in the dump near the desert town where Notley grew up.

Notley is known for provoking self-hypnotism, or placing herself in a trance, or simply pressing on her eyelids until phosphenes begin to show themselves, all in order to access something otherworldly for her work. She often channels the resulting visions/voices straight to the page, which is a lot of Culture of One. Her writing is most oblique in the first several pages, with voices shifting within poems without any delineation. Notley moves the perspective from her narrator/self as poet, to self in France (where she currently resides), to Marie, to the personification of Mercy, to the character Eve Love (a local cum junkie rock star whose wonderful “song lyrics” Notley peppers throughout the book: “you’re the one who cares, my glittering eternal self / my smoothing wilderness of righteousness”). In the beginning, it is as if Notley’s having a conversation with these individuals about the undertaking of the book: “This poem is for me, I said, I’m trying to know something.” A lot of the writing is amorphous and difficult to follow in this first ten pages or so; but it all feels like trepidation, if anything, about approaching the character and story of Marie.

After these initial difficult pages, we come upon the book’s namesake poem in which Notley provides such tactile and direct information it’s a bit of a shock: “Marie made things in the gully…she wrote things on paper discarded in the dump and she made figures out of wood and rocks and cord” She tells us of Marie’s art, her many dogs, and her continual rebuilding of her shack after Satanist teenage girls periodically burn it down (along with all her detritus art and writing). The final line of “Culture of One” punctures the crux of the book, when Notley asks Marie, “What are you going to do when they burn up your shack?” Her answer: “I don’t care, it’ll still be great here.” Marie chooses this life, this culture of one, even at so great a cost.

Notley takes this basic knowledge of Marie, of Buy-Rite manager and pathological liar Leroy, and Eve Love, and weaves the narratives together from otherwise disparate circumstances. Initially, Marie is isolated – she only interacts with Leroy, who provides her with hose water and expired food, and with the local teenagers, who smear shit on her shack and eventually discover more cruel forms of terror. Marie is a conduit for revelation, showing others more about themselves than her personal mysteries. At one point, Leroy convinces himself that Marie has eaten one of her dogs. He asks her about the dog: “What happened to your white dog, Marie? I don’t have a white dog. But Leroy knows she swallowed it, her soul/ She ate it… Don’t tease me, she says. Please./ She takes her stuff and leaves. Leroy’s afraid he’s had a sick/ train of thought.” The teenage girls are waiting outside the Buy-Rite: “She’s looking at me! one screams;/ her dog’s gonna bite me shrieks another. They make a lot of noise and run away.” Marie is a vessel for “sick trains of thought” for the locals. But her emotional livelihood is with her dogs, in pieces of art she creates, in her eventual creation of a codex, as well as her visions, though her visions often touch on a dark memory she knows to be the cause of the lace-like scars on her body, but she cannot fully remember.

Eventually, those who rotate around Marie come into closer orbit; their stories and experiences become more entangled and violent. Significantly, the women in this book—Marie, Eve Love, Mercy, even the ringleader of the teenagers—re-realize themselves through difficult experiences, emerging with a greater sense of purpose. Marie in particular is striking—she is of her own accord and wields a wild agency: “Marie was run over twice, in the 60s, by army jeeps…they didn’t expect to see her walking by the road, with her/ dogs, so they didn’t see her. They ran over her. Twice./ She got back up”.

Marie’s story is also the narrator’s story; the narrator continually collapses herself with Mercy, Eve Love and Marie: “Marie’s scars are lace—/ and mine are poems”. She spins multiple selves into a convoluted whole. As the entire final poem, “Marie Alone in Meaning,” states, “It means that I make perfect sense.”

*


In the Pines

Monday, March 31st, 2008

by Alice Notley
Penguin Books 2007
Reviewed by Ben Mirov

7.5 of 10 stars

Whole Night Through

notley cover

Alice Notley’s In the Pines takes its title from a Leadbelly song of same name. The lyrics of the blues classic go like this:

My girl, my girl, don’t lie to me
Tell me where did you sleep last night

In the pines, in the pines
Where the sun don’t ever shine
I would shiver the whole night through

My girl, my girl, where will you go
I’m going where the cold wind blows

In the pines, in the pines
Where the sun don’t ever shine
I would shiver the whole night through

My husband, was a hard working man
‘Til a mile and a half from here
His head was found in a driving wheel
But his body never was found

My girl, my girl, don’t lie to me
Tell me where did you sleep last night

In the pines, in the pines
Where the sun don’t ever shine
I would shiver the whole night through
(repeat)

The song is interesting because of the similarities in structure and tone it shares with Notley’s book (if you haven’t heard the tune before, it’s worth checking out on YouTube. Nirvana’s tremendous cover should also be mentioned). Composed of repeating questions and their answers, the structure relies on an interchange between two personas. The opening line, “My girl, my girl, don’t lie to me,” tells us the first persona claims some type of ownership and authority over the second, the “girl.” In the ensuing lines we learn that the girl has lost her husband and that her sadness and dispossession have driven her into exile.

The comparison between the girl and Notley is obvious. Notley survived the untimely death of her husband Ted Berrigan in 1983 and went on to expatriate to Paris in the early nineties. Although Berrigan’s death and Notley’s expatriation may only be indirectly related, unlike the girl in the Leadbellly’s song, the similarities lend insight into the overall tone of In the Pines. This is a book full of haunting lamentation. It is also a reply to the discourses of power that seek to control and paraphrase those emotions.

The structure of the Leadbelly song is also an impetus into the complexities of In the Pines. Two personas compose the dialog that gives the song its structure. The back and forth between these personas moves the song forward. This occurs in Notley’s book as well, where poems contain multiple voices. This section from the opening long poem, also titled “In the Pines,” functions in much the same way as the Leadbelly song:

If you detest everything about your society, you say,
                         why are you writing?
It is time to change writing completely.
You are not doing that.
Wait and see.

The back and forth between two personas propels this poem. Just as in the Leadbelly song, one persona questions while the other replies. The main difference is that Notley is explicit about her aim in using the technique. Unlike Leadbelly, she doesn’t intend to tell a story. Instead, she is concerned with “changing writing completely.”

Just as Leadbelly’s song gives form to the story of a young woman who has fallen on hard times, so does In the Pines seek to embody the voices of those who cannot speak for themselves. Like Whitman in “Song of Myself,” Notley contains “multitudes.” The difference is that her multitudes are specifically the disposed, forgotten, forsaken and often the dead, as in this section from “The Black Trailor (a noir fiction)”:

You say that you’re dead and it’s dead: can’t be pushed
                   back through a hole in timelessness?
You say that I can’t really get at you.
You’re not where you expected to be dead, I say.
Is this a system? you say.

In a sense, Notley is more medium than poet. The rendering of multiple personas in In the Pines reminds me of the San Francisco Renaissance poet Jack Spicer’s analogy of “poet as radio.” Notley is not writing so much as she is ciphering information from various sources outside herself and placing it into a “system.” In a way she is more like a “machine” than a “writer.” In a reading at the Kelly Writers House on November 6, 2006 (available at PENN sound), Notley professed to being “high on interferon,” a drug used to treat hepatitis C, while composing In the Pines. At the same reading, Notley also told the audience she composed Mysteries of Small Houses, a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, in a “process of self-hypnosis.” Whether or not the drug affected her writing, or whether she actually writes in a trance, it is clear that being in an altered state is a key component of Notley’s writing process and one of the most arresting aspects of her as a contemporary writer.

Beginning with her formative years as a poet on the lower-east side of New York and continuing with her expatriation to Paris, Notley has always identified herself as an outsider. It’s a title she has earned throughout her career and why she is perhaps one of the only poets writing today who could have written a visionary book like In the Pines. Although it is laced with vitriol, desperation, tribulation, sadness and regret, In the Pines, is hopeful. As its dedication “For my sons and their friends” suggests, In the Pines is for younger generations of readers and writers. It is instructive in the sense that it attempts to show new writers how a poet can change poetry for the better of everyone, poets and non-poets alike.

*