Posts Tagged ‘Hansa Bergwall’

Ginnungagap

Monday, June 15th, 2009

by Lightsey Darst
Red Dragonfly Press 2009
Reviewed by Hansa Bergwall

6stars_7

Toward a Supreme Fiction

darst coverIn Lightsey Darst’s dark chapbook Ginnungagap, she plays at the perpetual cross-section of time, belief and suffering. The chapbook takes its name from a term in Norse mythology referring to the magical void before creation. The author does not have a consistent cosmology, but all across Ginnungagap, religious or spiritual conceits inform and infuse delicate, modern poems of pain and joy.

Sometimes “God” is capitalized, but this is not an indication that s/he is to be revered. For example, in “Miscarriage,” Darst likens spooning scallops from a shell to her sister’s tragic miscarriage:

the raw body of my
unmade sister, 
                      God ate that, beating,
cracking the top of her egg, bending
to scoop with his fingers and suck
what was to be

Nowhere in this chapbook is the divine to be comforting. God is more likely to be a callous tyrant. In “Dog Days,” god is lowercase; god is a small, annoying pest:

When I was little I broke open
the house with its screens
of dying flies. And god

burst in through the crack
I made, buzzing like a wasp.

Both cases evoke a divine with the capacity to hurt. In one, God is a disinterested tyrant who shucks fetuses like they are shellfish. In the next, god is a bug to wave away and a sting to avoid. In other poems, she professes to hate the God of high places and love the gods who are made of twigs and mud and hang around the neck like a primitive talisman. The sum of these gods might be the large God she fears, so perhaps what we have, for whatever reason, is a stated preference for the small comforts of the micro over the inconquerable largesse of the macro. It is a familiar war, rendered here with a careful eye and ear.
 
In her best poems, Darst presents common scenes packed with the presence of something otherworldly, of indefinable mystery, only vaguely a “God” or “god.” “Blueberry-picking” is a particularly well-crafted example of this:

which fat fruit would come free
from the twigs, I picked a pint,
we picked two, we talked
between the bushes and twice

we heard a train come like
a little relief, or a little reminder,
its shuddering track somewhere by,

behind the empty tobacco barn,
but not so close,
and not so far.

Pleasantly, among friends, life goes on, but is rocked by the shudder of passing trains. No one is quite sure where it comes from. This is the feeling of spirit that Darst consistently invokes: the way moments of religious experience can slip into life unexpected like a wasp, or overwhelm in a moment of grief. Darst imagines and examines each phenomenon in her poetry. She reminds her readers that the ghost of the divine is inextricable from daily life, but never purports to have answers beyond this. These poems feel good to inhabit because of that spark, and her predilection to present the divine without benevolence complicates and undercuts the warm feeling usually associated with divine presence.
 
After reading Lightsey Darst’s chapbook, I have no idea what her beliefs are beyond the fact that she finds it valuable to ardently to engage with belief and spirit—with the magical void that her title speaks to. It is a rich vein and this little chapbook has some real gems.

*


Creatures for a Day

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

by Reginald Gibbons
Louisian State University Press 2008
Reviewed by Hansa Bergwall

4_5

To Know It

gibbons cover

In this collection’s first poem, “Ode: Citizens,” Reginald Gibbons narrates an encounter that previews one of his recurring themes: guilt. An old homeless woman pushes her shopping cart full of possessions across the sidewalk. She looks at him.  He thinks about speaking to her and then doesn’t. It occurs to Gibbons that she may be the same age as his mother:

… I feel guilty- her existence is knowable but willfully not
known by people like me- yet this is not an aunt of whom I never
knew, nor is it Mother herself as I never knew her,

As I needed to know her, or rather as I needed her to be,

To be knowable to me emotionally,

To be capable of knowing me,

This is an old woman I don’t know who could use twenty dollars
          and a different life,

A different history

The admission of guilt forms the prism that bends Gibbons’s poetry. A person becomes a worthy subject because he asks him for bus fare or passes time drinking stale coffee at an auto body shop. Peculiarity and poverty walk with Gibbons’s guilt and moralizing through this book. He gets abstract quickly; “To be knowable to me emotionally” is a very weighty construction.  Nods to academic schools of thought make the longtime professor professorial as well. In “Ode: I had been reading ancient Greeks,” he writes,

Wonder: philosophy and poetry flowing like a kind of water down river
          Courses of human

Human experience, which changes over time , so thinking and feeling
          change too, the way water of some endless river that will never reach
          any sea passes through narrow rocky rapids

Rapids but also smooth broad channels, running heroically or angrily, or
          peacefully or somehow horribly…

Heraclitus’s philosophy of unending flux was more poetically described by the philosopher himself when he said that you can never step into the same river twice. Gibbons borrows this well-worn metaphor for time and belabors it into a recognizable cliché.

Reginald Gibbons does know what excellent poetry can do. In “Fern Texts, Autobiographical Essay on the Notebooks of Young Samuel Taylor Coleridge” he writes,

                            … the poem needs a
conviction of uniqueness
                             and a tone of voice as if
whispering praise and sorrow,
                             Language attuned to spicules
sepals and scars, to surprise
                             that pleasingly confounds ex-
pectation, and attentive-
                             ness that at least sometimes thrills
to the strange, the sublimely
                             peculiar and to the im-
ponderable and the un-
                             conscious-

It is an excellent description of poetry worth reading. I wish more of this book pleasingly confounded me with the sublimely peculiar. That would be great.

And yet there are a few moments of verse as alive as his description. Here is one, also from “Fern Texts,”

So perhaps you displaced real
                                 suffering and clamor of
the thick  human crowd onto
                                 the appealing green fronds that
need no literacy nor
                                 franchise—this is the image
before your mind’s eye—lovely
                                 “Fern… scattered thick but growing
single”; and still they grow in
                                 our unavoidable self-
conscious self-dividedness,
                                 our heritages at odds,
our paper trails and trials of
                                 spills and slips, they are growing
in our back seats and wet shoes…

*


On Spec

Monday, April 14th, 2008

by Tyrone Williams
Omnidawn 2008
Reviewed by Hansa Bergwall

4

(Puzz[u..]la)r

on specMy mother once gave me a Hallmark card that was both sappy and vaguely offensive. It said, “I am a pearl, in an oyster, under the sand, at the bottom of the Ocean. If you loved me, you would find me.” What gleams in Tyrone Williams’s poems in On Spec proves just as difficult to find. I will grudgingly admit that I found a couple of pearls. Be warned though, this book is cryptic and often seems deliberately designed to confuse and obfuscate. If Williams were in the business of making crossword puzzles, I suspect he would incorrectly number the clues out of spite.

If punctuation were salt for words, Williams has unscrewed the shaker. His periods, dashes and ellipsis heap up on the words that would have anyone brave enough to recite these poems stuttering. I suspect much of his extraneous marks are mere visual adornment. He is also fond of cerebral punning he will use parentheses to fit two words in the space of one: “lo(f)ts,” for example. It’s all very distracting. It either hides what is good in the poems, or hides that there is nothing good in the poem. Here is an example of the latter:

Deventure
                                    (R-Steve Portman, Ohio)
The throne behind the throne—
                 pseud/ascepter—
his mommy (some mammy) [ H.
                 R.40] railroad(s) Freedom—
center(s) liberte
                 fixe—
                                credit deferred
(Portman-/portwoman-/{portar}-/
portress-/carriage-house-/{slave}-
quarters/cabin-(et te) Bush…

 I sense this poem vaguely criticizes Republicans. The nature of the complaint is about as clear as someone mumbling, lips barely parted, clearly angry but not yet with enough courage to speak. Much of the book reads like this poem.

Several times in the book, Williams writes something as clear, bright and fresh as anything being written today. With subtle brilliance he delivers on his themes of the African American experience, gang violence, political suppression, a broken incarceration system. These moments, though rare, are exceptional. In “Descant,” a ghost runs from his newly slain body:

Descant
I left my heart in the teeth of jumper-cables—
black tongue, superfluous nipples…

By the time I hit the yellow tape—
it was already turning red…

Of my fair and alabaster love?
My redundant chains drawn in chalk?

Halfway to the stars I stopped—
turned, spat—it’s too late baby…

The poem inhabits its space of a crime scene although the voice rings from beyond life. The heart gripped in jumper cables is as arresting an image as they come. The regret in the voice, of a life wasted hits upon the tragic and expansive. At the same time, the body is fenced off in yellow tape and white chalk. The punctuation clearly aids the rhythm of the voice. If a majority of the poems in On Spec, read like this one I would give it rave reviews.

But more often, Williams banishes his readers into labyrinths of abstraction and theory. The style of these abstract musings varies wildly but it isn’t pleasant in any form:

qua tertium
quid—qua
“natural equivalence”

qua “the unity
of analogy”—qua
The Great Chain

Of Being—qua

It is tedium I wouldn’t wish on anyone. It is particularly disappointing for a poet who shows such raw talent in the rare poems like “Descant.” Line after line of academic theory references will go by without one rhythm or image to bring the reader back to something bodily, sensual, or engaging.

The themes Williams espouses about identity, imprisonment, slavery and prejudice come through on occasion with brilliance. I wish he more consistently brought his language down to earthly sounds and images so that the brilliant ideas ran throughout. But Williams chose the cryptic and cerebral route most often and it proves tedious. I do not recommend this book.

*


Tongue and Groove

Monday, March 24th, 2008

by Stephen Cramer
U. of Illinois Press 2007
Reviewed by Hansa Bergwall

7.5

Born & Born Again

cramer coverImagine a man in the subway who removes his shirt and starts picking a scab. Would you look the other way? I would, but I think Stephen Cramer would watch and find an uncomfortable beauty about the scene. He writes with uncommon courage. His new book Tongue & Groove has poems of the sublime and the ugly. This collection builds on his first book, Shiva’s Drum, but Cramer owns his style more boldly. This book distinguishes itself with an earnest voice. He approaches even unorthodox subjects with the mindfulness of a Buddhist monk.

Maybe I’ve been reading the wrong books, but a lot of poets writing today favor the ironic or cynical over the earnest. Few have the courage to write a love poem without hurt, or irony. Cramer’s “Glaciers” is a forthright celebration of love. He sets the scene as a hike over a landscape and comments on how an ice age has changed that landscape. With this long view of time and shape he cuts to a heady and thrilling sentiment of love:

before we begin, you must know:
                                    I’m awkward with a hammer
                & my right angles slope

even with a T-square, the level’s lime-
                                    green bubbles forever misaligned.
                 love, only now I’m learning

the ways of lasting construction:
                                    dovetail, double tongue & groove,
                  & you don’t need a hammer

to build what we’re building.
                                     What steers us, unseen
                  but solid as bedrock?

Let’s make our move
                                     now. In my chest I can feel
                  a billion trembling wings

veering at once.

The hairs on the back of my neck stood up the first time I read this poem. He constructs his tingling moments out of a little wildness, philosophy, and narrative. He can be earnest because he is never cliché.

Cramer also chooses the subject of the outcast as his impetus to poetic realization in several poems. Even though these outcasts appear in public, his attentive description of them can feel voyeuristic. Doesn’t he know the polite thing to do is look away and ignore? His insistence that the reader look with him made me uncomfortable at times, but I was always grateful afterward. In “Strings” he chooses a crazy and dirty man who has a ukulele with no strings which he strums until his fingers bleed. Cramer uses this figure to reflect on Buddhist ideas of reincarnation:

…because on these streets

don’t even think about looking
for a next life—Sweetheart,
you ain’t gonna get it—

& all you can do is prepare
to be astonished out of your body
& into another’s, to feel your way

into something as remote
as the grayed & toiling flesh
still grinding away at that scored

& barren wood—phantom
strings & phantom resonance.

This rebirth through empathy re-imagines reincarnation and the Buddhist worldview. It makes the idea of becoming other more accessible to a skeptical 21st century mind while honoring the idea of the sacred. The music of the language, the realist world and the imaginative philosophy come together elegantly. Poetry may not be a vehicle for rhetorical argument, but it can reveal an image of truth. This poem reveals a beautiful way of imagining empathy.

A current political world can be tricky to write about. Maybe that is because the liberal and conservative talking points frame our thinking so well that it is difficult to write a fresh view. When Cramer takes up the challenge in “Fuel,” he mostly succeeds. In the poem, he imagines a bus, with an eagle on its side that runs on blood, types O, A and B. The bus runs on newscasters, media, and 2 am knocks on the door. He makes our nation feel like a late-night rerun of the film “Speed,” where Keanu Reeves cannot slow the bus below 50 mph or it will explode. He ends it with a call to slow down:

… 12 ton bus
with an eagle on its side
& this isn’t my stop
but I’m getting off
because I don’t know about you
but I can walk from here.

Any political poem runs the risk of alienating a reader who disagrees. Yet as a caricature this poem reveals some truth by distorting it. The poem succeeds because the image rings true, even if the framing and proscription are debatable.

Cramer crafts his poetry well and a jazz sensibility goes from soft to brassy. He seems to intuitively arrive at insights through his work and he shares them. These insights always come from paying very close attention to the lover, to the homeless man, to war. He earns each big thought. His tone is earnest and appealing. I recommend reading this book.

*