Posts Tagged ‘Jackie Clark’

The Bag of Broken Glass

Monday, April 21st, 2008

by Yerra Sugarman
The Sheep Meadow Press 2008
Reviewed by Jackie Clark

5

Kind of Bag

bag of broken glassYerra Sugarman’s second collection of poems, The Bag of Broken Glass, is definitely absent of organizational problems. The poems are neatly divided into six sections with the apropos “Coda” acting as the final section. The word coda always strikes me as a poetic way of declaring the end of something, as that is what it is I guess, but it always does seem a bit fancy, too consciously musical. But my opinion on whether or not it works depends on what it is used in conjunction with, and the mood of the poems it is serving to finalize.

The heightened Poetic-ness of the word coda in this collection is more than appropriate, as Sugarman spends more than 100 pages writing poems infused with religion, death and disappointment. The poems are mostly narrative, mostly confessional, as the reader can infer by the book’s dedication, “For My Mother, in Memory Pearl Maler Sugarman (1919-2000),” and the completely heartfelt first section of the book, “Her Hands.” The poems in this section relay in pretty good detail the horrors of having to watch a parent die a slow and painful death. And because they are about the poet’s mother, many childhood recollections appear, as it is probably necessary to the process of grieving to make sense of the death of the person who gave you life. That said, is it horrible to say that while reading these poems maybe I was slightly bored and anxious to move on to another poem, which only in turn made me anxious to move on from there? Stanzas like,

Solitary my father—
the wool of his voice,

the thinning part we could barely hear
death reel in,
raveling it and winding it around my mother’s dying.

in the poem “The Lamentations of the Crows,” appear again and again through out the book. And it is heartrending and yes, it quiets me with compassion and future fear but that may just be because I feel badly when anyone experiences hardship—not because the poems necessarily speak to me.

It may be though that the experiences she is drawing on are things I have yet to experience or that culturally, I cannot understand. Sugarman uses Yiddish phrases throughout the book and uses her family’s experience as Polish Jews during World War II as the basis of many poems in this collection. It is thoughtful of her to include the translations of certain Yiddish words at the bottom of the page, though at times it felt slightly gratuitous. This is not to take away from their obvious importance to this text. I think overall Sugarman works well within the framework she creates and I can see how people marvel at stanzas like this one from the poem, “Jounral: Rai’ut Coma Ward, Tel Aviv, July 2003”:

And what of our connecting
                 the body’s pain,
                                but also the soul’s,

the mind’s, the heart’s—their pain
               with the pain of the world

Sugarman’s poems are constantly trying to achieve the above. She is trying to understand the synergy of pain and suffering and life and love. A valiant task for sure. But speculations like “Maybe this is what memory is: / God wounds” make less sense than she wants them to. I can no longer suspend my disbelief long enough to posture the possibility of my memories being wounds from God. She’s strayed too far from the center; does this particular God have any particular motivation? The religious fervor and fatalism in this book leave me an outsider. I am sure there are many other people who are moved by experiences similar to the poet’s. I don’t really think that my being an outsider makes much of a difference.

*


Our Aperture

Friday, February 15th, 2008

by Ander Monson
New Michigan Press 2007
Reviewed by Jackie Clark

7.5

Heart-Shaped Book

monson cover

Ander Monson’s chapbook Our Aperture is 30 pages of poems that feel huge, but huge in the sort of referential way one wanders through subway stations and feels like s/he is seeing the whole shape of the moment, encapsulated and removed, a participant.

These poems revolve around and around the “I,” and gratefully the “I” is less of a judge and more of a participant. The concern or conceit of this “I” involves a genuine understanding of the way circumstance colors our situations and the way that something which is pushed responds by being moved: “What came after the world: / silence, lots of it.”

There are three poems in this chapbook with the title “Availability.” The subject matter of these poems is what one might expect: quasi-lists of things that are available and of ways to be available. But they also go further than that; much of the language is recycled and recontextualized in each poem. Even the forms change; some just pour down the page, and others are neatly tucked into in even stanzas.

Some begin like stories: “In the midst of darkness, this presence / is also always and it will be it…” Others start in medias res: “What is also is always.” But to look at the idea of availability from the point of view of someone who has occasionally been made available or who seeks availability calls into question just what it is one looks to be available for, and at last, the many methodical ways in which the concept itself can be deconstructed.

While all of these poems broke my heart, the one I marked up most was “Exhaust”:

streaming exhaust
out of a pip that leads to the heart of the world
where great things are constantly being created
from scratch

 And:

Who
cares about now. Fuck the moment. I want the next
one, and the one after that: result, proceeding, the dark
heart of it out of reach of the streetlight, flashlight,
motion-detector floodlight you installed
to keep the world out of your heart.

The poignancy of this greed for more and more moments weighs heavy on the chest; the image of the floodlight as protector of the heart made me think of the way one might move around slowly late at night, understanding that the lights are motion detectors and that turning them on is a bad thing. The tender and careful feeling I get from this makes my own heart feel less exposed if only because I am reminded that there are other little hearts out there guarding themselves as well.

The title Our Aperture cleverly suggests joint ownership of the speaker’s split. It can be read as collective sigh and protection, or as instance of failure—of flaw or blip that is unfortunate but unavoidable, as many things turn out to be when reasoned enough. The last poem, “Any Vanishing Point is as Good as This,” reflects this:

half-hopes
of the family viewed only from above
from such a distance that love disappears.

Perhaps there is a limit to love’s extensions and perhaps the place where this is true is safer.

*


Frail-Craft

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008

by Jessica Fisher
Yale University Press 2007
Reviewed by Jackie Clark

4_5

I Can, I Does

fishercoverMaybe there is no way around making sweeping generalizations about the Yale Series of Younger Poets prize: winning this prize is unquestionably an honor; the fact that one’s manuscript is selected and will sit among the likes of John Ashbery and Adrienne Rich is something; most “younger” poets would be pleased to be selected.

Another point which begs to be made is that certain types of poems/manuscripts seem to be championed in this circumstance: poems that are safe but pretty, tense but disclosed, risqué but not truly subversive. Welcome to Jessica Fisher’s Frail-Craft, a book that balances the dominant and egocentric “I” with the more universal and heavily praised collective identity. This book is full of what feel like genuine experiences and emotions coupled with sometimes interesting but mostly tired and intrusive insights.

The first poem in Frail-Craft is called “Journeying,” which nicely frames a partial conceit of the book. The poem has no “I”s and is lauded as the universal, metaphorical journey that we all are destined to make. There is danger and we are scared, etc., etc. Fast-forward to “Dream for My Other Brother” and you get the rest of the conceit. Not only is the “I” doing the directing in this case, but it is also cast as the knowing one, the one that can protect, the one that knows best. This is the dichotomy of these poems: a passive universal versus a knowing “I.” Each operates in a clever manner; each attempts to sound like the other in order to prevent being self-absorbed or superficial.

The “I” makes commentary on its own commentary in many of these poems. In “Canal,” the third installment in the “Nonsight” sequence, the speaker postures, “but if the eye can love—and it can, it does—then I held you and was held.” Though the tone is controlled and forward, it is in need of reassurance, of imposing dashes meant to confirm what the speaker might have been able to state implicitly. “A Riddle for the Body” ends with a similarly self-conscious/self-aware need for validation: “What do you have to say about that?” And in “Flayed,” the constant reliance on the “I” makes the poem rounded and deflates everything else the poem seems poised to accomplish.

In “Now—The Parade” we see again how uncomfortable Fisher is with letting the claims of a poem stand on their own. Toward the end of the poem this line appears most unexpectedly: “Distinctions in values desired and values attainable.” This simple abstraction pleased me, but again, Fisher doesn’t seem one to leave well enough alone; she continues, “Though I will allow you to draw your own conclusion on the above, I am compelled to tell you […]” It’s not so much that what we are told is problematic; it is just the fact that the speaker feels the need to tell, tell, tell—in essence, to explain her poems.

Much in the way that Fisher’s poems tend to end with some kind of internal commentary, many begin with precursors, short phrases that guide the reader into the poem. “June” begins, “Most unfathomable.” “Castaway,” begins, “It began with a lesson.” “Frail-Craft” begins, “It’s a true story.” These phrases do little more than defend a poem that has yet to be placed under attack; there’s the hint that our poet fears no one will believe her.

Yet the poems in Frail-Craft do have a certain delicateness to them. The prose-poem “Novella” is about a missing hero, a missing love, etc., and works hard for its mystery; omniscient voices don’t intrude. To return my sweeping generalization, different types of poems do different things and these seem to be a comfort for people who fancy themselves sensitive and perceptive but unwanting of a mess, linguistically, psychologically, or otherwise.

*