Posts Tagged ‘Joshua Beckman’

An Evening with Joshua Beckman & Peter Gizzi

Wednesday, December 14th, 2011

On Sunday, December 12, 2011 The Observatory at Proteus Gowanus hosted a special reading for poets, Joshua Beckman and Peter Gizzi. Beckman read all new poems, mostly from his recently released limited edition letter-pressed chapbook called Poems. Beckman’s new work is sparse and had the packed room leaned over in a hushed silence to catch his every syllable.

After his reading there was a brief intermission followed by Peter Gizzi who read from his newly released book, Threshold Songs.

Here’s Gizzi’s set-list:

“Lullaby”

Hypostasis & New Year”

Eclogues”

Snow Globe”

How I Remember Certain Fields of Inquiry (and ones I only imagine)”

Analemma”

This Trip Around the Sun Is Expensive”

A Penny for the Old Guy”

Tiny Blast”

Apocrypha”

A Note on the Text”

Oversong”

History Is Made at Night”

Bardo”

Modern Adventures at Sea”


State of the Union

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

Edited by Joshua Beckman & Matthew Zapruder
Wave Books 2008
Reviewed by John Deming

8

Fundamentals

state of the unionThom Gunn died on April 25, 2004, three days before photos of torture from Abu-Ghraib were revealed. At the time, Osama bin Laden was nowhere in sight, the twin towers were a crushing memory, American soldiers labored in Iraq despite a year-old presidential declaration of “mission-accomplished,” and terrorists bred terrorists all the while. In his elegy “For Thom Gunn,” poet Garrett Caples laments, “i’m sorry you had to die a time when evil’s got this country by the balls…”

Some things have changed since 2004, and many haven’t. State of the Union, a timely collection of fifty contemporary “political” poems edited by Joshua Beckman and Matthew Zapruder, chronicles the deeply-nuanced frustration and cynicism—as well as the procreant urge towards hope—that have resulted from life during the Bush administration.

Poet Philip Levine once remarked that every poem is a political poem, because “telling the truth is a political act.” The poems in State of the Union are overtly political in varying degrees. Some name names; Matthew Rohrer’s aggressive “Elementary Science for Dick Cheney” is a humble chat about animals and ethics until it references Cheney’s “artificial heart” and finally informs the vice president, “it is a good thing / to watch you die.”

Yet many of the best poems in this book are more subtle. Nick Flynn’s “Imagination,” a standout, uses only six spare couplets and concludes with suggestive force: “that // war, say, jesus / did we really just make it all up?” Politicians are often criticized for preaching lofty ideals without laying a specific groundwork for success; these lines suggest that imagination often precedes action, for better or for worse.

If some of the voices in Union are frustrated, angry, even cynical, they are not absent hope. They embody the abstract perceptions of a swath of (albeit, liberal-minded) Americans, and in doing so, present a climate of fear, deception and violence. The very notions of virtue and clarity become suspect; in “Kettle,” Mary Ruefle muses that perfectly clear minds were behind the Holocaust, that “the killers/were given advice, stay calm, lean forward,/do what you have to do with a clear mind.” Nonetheless, virtue and clarity are significant, even while abstract; a climate of horror exists as counterpoint to some kind of living ideal, real or imagined.  

If the economy settles itself, the war in Iraq ends with grace, Osama bin Laden is captured and all is made right in the land, this book will serve as a useful reminder of an uneasy era; if not, all the same. The poems that name names will inevitably seem dated either way, will seem emblematic of a specific era—but as the title indicates, perhaps that is the aim. When Thom Gunn died, the country was less than six months away from re-electing George W. Bush. Now we go again. If every poem is a political act, then what is true of all good poetry is true of good political poems, of good and bad political acts and intentions: they are true. There are more fundamental metaphors at work.

*


Shake

Sunday, May 7th, 2006

by Joshua Beckman
Wave Books 2006
Reviewed by John Deming

8_5

A Karate Chop of Love

beckman shake coverAnger’s not a crime. Neither are shoes. Pot maybe. But I suppose with any, it’s a question of balance and self-control. There’s a lot about shoes in Joshua Beckman’s new book, and there’s definitely pot. There’s also a bit more anger than we’ve seen from him before. But the undercurrent of frustration, especially in the book’s opening section, is the most compelling thing here; and the way he masters it in the end shows yet another step forward for this increasingly important poet, and results in one of the better poetry titles so far this year.

I don’t mean to imply this is an overtly “angry” book. It’s not. Beckman’s traditionally adept at converting the personal to the existential in a deceptively plain-spoken way, and at encoding just what needs to be encoded to avoid self-satisfying autobiography. But from the opening section, “Shake”—the first of the book’s three sections, each a series of untitled poems—there’s a shift in tone from his previous three books.

The title section is thick with a sense of loss. There’s also the occasional hint of bitterness, as in the second poem when he references “the unbecoming ways/of everyone.” And in nearly every poem, a sense of powerlessness against some larger forces: “I too, at one time, felt the elation of being a small drunken cog/in a giant destructive empire” is followed shortly by “No one can explain even a little what’s going down.”

Of the potential resolutions to powerlessness, perhaps the most evocative is Beckman’s suggestion that “We may invent.” The fact that creation, especially art, can provide sustenance is something easy to ignore in contemporary America, as is “personal decay.” Embracing these things becomes an accomplishment of something against the nothing, a nothing that “no one can explain,” and that becomes more complex when one is overwhelmed with a horrifying political climate and an aging body. There is also the fever of lost love, as in these visions, which close the second poem:

your red pants, your cradled purse,
the next man who will leave
his lover for you.

The first section is only weak when the narrator becomes inexplicably sunny. Its eighth poem has some good stuff, but the opening lines “Beautiful rounded earth/we accept so your fluorescence” and the final line “That people, all at once, can be kind and thoughtful” left me flat. More attractive was the section’s ending, in which the narrator muses on the possibility of getting high with high school kids who’d think him “fucked up.” The narrator would like to warn them of a police presence in the neighborhood:

they would say we know, fuck them,
and we would know what they meant,
that they meant no harm.

The book’s middle section, “Let the People Die,” serves as a necessary bridge between the first and third. In the series, (a sonnet sequence, save for one poem that indulges in a fifteenth line), Beckman’s talent for incorporating repetition is central. He decides to be blunt about politics and religion, which is striking—“All this horrible conquering in the name of Christianity,”—but the poem that got me is the fourteenth in the series, which opens “I like your handsome drugs” and contains the laugh-out-loud lines “The man screamed out, ‘The/karate chop of love,’ before tackling that woman.” The karate chop of love comes up three more times in the sonnet, and serves as a servable metaphor for the book itself.

But a lot of the book’s frustration is controlled—and ultimately, purged—in the final and best section of the book, “New Haven.” I doubt if anyone’s written so well with the southern Connecticut city in mind since Wallace Stevens and his ordinary evening. There’s some melancholy (“the flat world of borrowed things”), some reflection on relationships (“A weak woman/will never make you happy”) and some good-humored cynicism:

wrapped in a blissful dream
the moonlight shines down
brightly—
but I don’t really know that
I just read it in a book.

Loss and frustration pervade this section too, but they are well-honed and approached with intelligence and, more importantly, balance. Occasional rhyming is a little less interesting, but the poems are consistently awe-inspiring and build up to more than welcome catharsis. We’re not used to hearing lines like “Listen, you little faggot” from Beckman, but as Gerald Stern once pointed out, Beckman’s is ultimately a poetry of affection. “All will reach an age and die at that age,” Beckman writes, and by the end, you may realize he’s right—this birthday party would be fucked without the karate chop of love.

*