Posts Tagged ‘Matt Soucy’

Descartes’ Loneliness

Monday, August 25th, 2008

by Allen Grossman
New Directions 2008
Reviewed by Matt Soucy

6_5stars_6

Lens Crafter

grossman cover

In his new book Descartes’ Loneliness, Allen Grossman subtly displays the affects of a life of thought: the knife-edge between intellect and passion. As the first and titular poem shows, when Grossman strives for pure intellect, he comes face to face with the realities of being a subjective human: “But in fact, toward evening, I am not / convinced there is any other except myself.” This line encapsulates the strongest images in the book: the poet himself, the mind, and the passage of time as seen through light. It also capably establishes the poet’s major themes: objectivism vs. subjectivism, perspective vs. reality, and truth vs. experience. Overall, the book is an interesting read for anyone dedicating his/her life to Liberal Arts academia.

Intermittently, Grossman inserts bold, imagistic poems such as “A Day’s Work” and “Timor Mortis, Inc., A Switchboard Memory.” Each of these poems revolves around the mother figure, who serves as a counterpoint to the character of Descartes. In “A Day’s Work” he writes:

Bobbed hair conceals
ears. Starched white shirt (Sleeves
rolled up with fierce intent.)
Hands in pockets of a straight skirt
of heavy material. She is looking
at the ground.

There are a few moments like this throughout the work that impact the reader both directly and broadly. The poet’s mother represents all things vague and human. These are the poems that seem most honest and effortless for Grossman. The intellectual connection here is vague, but not invisible.

The majority of Descartes’ Loneliness is focused, obviously, on Descartes, although it is not as readily apparent as the title indicates. Two of the poet’s greatest notions come when considering Descartes. First, he indicates that a profound given is a type of ownership. And isn’t that true? That first person who truly blew your mind will forever occupy a piece of your life that you cannot extract. As Grossman puts it in, “A Kiss for You,”: “Take this kiss. / You are mine forever.”

Second, Grossman makes the self-important claim that truth in science, or direct scrutiny, cannot be ascertained, but can be detected through the lens of poetry. In, “Caedmon,” “Invention of Night,” and “A Long Romance,” Grossman does achieve moments of great poetry, exposing the truth of the Descartes mind that can only be understood, through metaphor: “You Will be Wrapped in Silk.”

The book is at its weakest when Grossman falls into explaining, which he does through direct address and, too often, exclamation. This is partially forgivable, as Grossman sometimes assumes the identity of Descartes in his letters to Princess Elizabeth. However, within the poems, the exclamations draw the reader out of the moment and put too strong a Grossman stamp on the poem.

There is a balance to be had. In the final poem, “Votre Altresse,” the reader sees a thinkers’ sympathy between Grossman and Descartes. Descartes’ final days are spent in a foreign court where he is beleaguered and misunderstood. He will die as a showpiece, a novelty, in the court of Queen Christina of Sweden.

Grossman sets a high intellectual bar with his new book, and he touches that bar, I think. But I did not detect anything novel in the conversations of philosophy or poetry. Although he does a nice job of framing the classic dilemmas of Descartes, he does not add anything new.

*


Autobiomythography & Gallery

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

by Joe Millar
Brooklyn Arts Press 2007
Reviewed by Matt Soucy

8

Insiduous: Minatory Bull, Fiddler Crab
millar cover

Joe Millar’s Autobiomythography & Gallery is the best new book of poetry read by this reviewer this year.  It is incredibly strong.  Millar does not feel the need to jab the reader with poetic points or punch-lines; his poems thrive on ambiguity, intellect and the poignancy of images we half-understand.

The “Autobiomythography” section starts with a tone somewhere between Ben Lerner and Allen Ginsberg.  The first poem, “What is Given,” attacks the very strangeness of being alive.  The action of a car accident is nature’s “form of subtraction,” but when the driver discovers himself oddly alive, “that is a given.” 

From a first poem with that strength and lack of apology, Millar moves directly to “Autobiomythography.”  The titular poem is both beautiful and gritty; it truly blurs the lines between the poet’s life and a fantasy world.  The reader will spend the first read-through trying to find the author as much as the poetry and find that both are subject to interpretation: “My brain: rack and pinion/piston: / misfires. Pretty soon I’m drifting at lake’s center…”  and later, “A gun balloons one hand like a fiddler crab’s.” At this point, the reader must stop trying to make ready comparisons.

Millar embraces the ambiguity between story and self, and in no way are his thoughts tired or unoriginal.  Poems like “Zero Effect,” and “Rivers, Green and Not So” present existence in a spatial sense.  The reader gets the feeling of doors and sliding walls surrounding the poet and actually changing his identity. After staring at the “twenty-seven corners of my apartment” Millar focuses on some other self that isn’t, then, “I try on the hat.  I try on the name and it fits.”  As reality shifts without reason through time and space, so does personal identity.  The fickleness of truth in reality isn’t happening to us; it’s us. Yet amid the fickleness and disconnect, he maintains a drinking, gambling sarcasm:

Even my most insidious poker face
has seen my well-earned dollars
drift southward in the arms of friends harvesting
their shiny cranberries from the money bog.
Wanna go another round? Hell, hit me.
Vector formulas and stratagem of battle,
pickup lines and names for faces, stout
and slippery as language…

What if anything does a human face have to do with the abstract language (name) used to describe the human? Millar presents the idea of human reality/unreality early on in the book.  This leads to even more fantasizing as he progresses.  His fantasy is not whimsical or escapist, but for the sake of stronger knowledge.  He seamlessly ties any modern character (e.g. a family member, a meth dealer, himself) to mythical archetypes.  In the poem, “In Defense of Escapism as a Means to Express Free Will,” he writes:

A minatory bull is nearly redundant if the human element is excluded because the essence is still available & doesn’t myth reveal, finally, a certain elimination of the non-derivative Self?  We all must press the rock uphill or fuck a swan.  It’s give in or give up.

If our minds are coping with a constant reality shift in time and space, a myth is as rational an explanation for experience as any science.  Nothing should be ignored; nothing is ignored in Millar’s search for “the non-derivative Self.”

The idea of the unstable self has a fantastic affect on “Autobiomythography” both in its meaning and its movement.  In “Gallery” Millar continues that theme, but the primary focus becomes movement.  “Gallery” opens up to the reader with more unbridled chaos.  Even with its less constricted feeling, Millar maintains a perfect control over the direction of this large piece.  The reader is introduced with “Prelude” to a Bacchanal Carnival.  “Gallery, Where the Memory of the Body (i) Converges with its Various Instances,” maintains that feel as the reader tries to follow every aching part. The poem, printed sideways to accommodate its long lines, is dense with murky self-reflection and abstract reasoning; out of all the confusion, there are many lines that rise up and bite you in the back:

The gallery
not where you hang        portraits but where
      washed images slide from their celluloid frames
in corners the mind regrets having glanced at, the glances that glance
back.

And later, what seems like his battle cry: “Better to circle the thing with abstractions than / pin it down, where it can stare back at you.” In the end, Millar seems a poet that seems very strong and very real—a poet that works. The book’s final lines suggest the idea that people might be the sum of their own contradictions, and that they might be applauded for it:

White lights, the stage liquefied.
They stand and bow, smiling,
maskless, their costumes gripping their insulated bodies.
And of course, we all rise to our feet.
We had been on our knees since the beginning.

There are too many aspects to Autobiomythography & Gallery to be discussed in a review.  The thoughts here, subjective and limited, only give an impression of what is an incredibly tight and accomplished piece of work.  This is great poetry; it presents itself wholly and defeats any attempt to break it into composite parts.  Joe Millar has put together a remarkable first collection.

*

The Piercing

Tuesday, March 6th, 2007

by Christine Garren
Louisiana State University Press 2006
Reviewed by Matt Soucy

7

Living Clarity

garren coverIn Christine Garren’s new book, The Piercing, you will encounter some traditionally “poetic” imagery: leaves, ponds, old lovers, bits of garbage.  Fortunately, Garren manages to make them her own in an impressively personal display.  It’s poetry that looks and feels exactly like poetry but still offers a genuine poetic experience. How rare.

The book begins almost mired in nostalgia but soon moves beyond that narrowly subjective condition to examine the condition itself.  The result is a set of small, sophisticated poems that exhibit that uncontrollable expansion and contraction of time in a person’s mind.  The duration of a longtime friendship is comparable to a boy jumping off of a pier; an afternoon is comparable to a romance.

An instantaneous, paramount present hinges upon the massive action of a past that is constantly fading, synthesizing, and reducing itself into the small packages of “feeling” we are left with.  “The Piercing”, which closes the book, emphasizes and solidifies this theme.  Garren equates the loss of a loved one with an ear piercing:

                        …this

millimeter’s-width opening is for a decade to fit through.

Look, there you go.  There I go—there our landscape goes as if

through a fantastical roof’s hole, the shingle pulled off, the nail off—

our death is

flying over the city.

Garren’s images are more traditionally associated with concepts of objectivism or those transcendent moments when a social or natural experience pulls the author outside of him- or herself.  She artfully confuses the moment and expansiveness of life:

                …I felt
an insect step across my hand, across a vein
while my body was still closer to its birth than to its death.

There is a recurring suggestion that experience is formed in memory more so than it exists as an entity in and of itself.  In “The Swimmers” Garren describes boys swimming off of a pier in early evening.  Somehow, “from so long ago, this / has gained such force inside me.” The past is always abstract and overwhelming, but Garren has used precision and poise to control the depth of a lifetime.

*


Guilty at the Rapture

Tuesday, October 24th, 2006

by Keith Taylor
Hanging Loose Press 2006
Reviewed by Matt Soucy

3_5

Stick to the Prose

guilty at the raptureKeith Taylor’s new book Guilty at the Rapture is not a very exciting collection of verse.  However, definitely worth a read are Taylor’s prose poems, which contain both good storytelling and the subtleties you might hope to find in any decent book of poetry.

The title poem tells of the relief Taylor would find at being left alone with the damned on Judgment Day.  Taylor remembers himself as a young boy whose life was all misbehavior and guilt in an intense rural upbringing suffused with Christian values.  The poem is humorous and unburdened, offering clear insight and solid “telling.”  American Christian conservatism continues as the focus throughout the first set of poems. 

Unfortunately, other than “Guilty at the Rapture,” the poem-poems don’t hold many kicks. Those that begin with promising intrigue and intelligence, such as, “The Stud: Galahad, Alberta, 1927,” tend to fall flat in their closing lines.  Taylor seems to focus mostly on drawing pictures with his verse, but he makes the images too available to be of much use.  In “Grandmother Triptych” he writes:

We remember her black dresses
shining like Bibles, her hand
moving lightly over our backs and arms…

Lines like these seem on the verge of some insight or image that would reframe everyone’s concept of something familiar—in this case, Grandma—in a new and sympathetic way.  Unfortunately most of the poems do not go the distance.

After reminiscing about his Christian upbringing, Taylor introduces the prose poems.  Anyone interested in the poetry world would probably thoroughly enjoy “First Reading.”  In the piece, Taylor sneaks into a James Dickey reading and watches him sweat, swear, and offend almost everyone in the auditorium: “The nuns in the front row, who had been getting more and more agitated for half an hour, were obviously upset. Several left.” 

Where Taylor’s verse lacks punch, “First Reading” steps in with a laugh-out-loud conclusion. With similar strength, the close of the short story/prose poem “A Foreign Language” is both meaningful and effective.  Taylor adeptly closes with the human condition of holding singular, contradictory desires: “I didn’t want his mother to tell me that I had stayed too long in her rented garage.  Most of all, I didn’t want her to tell me that I had left too early.” That Taylor’s prose can convey this unexpected duality highlights what is absent from his verse.

Thus I find myself wishing that later pieces of verse, like “Hitchhiking,” had been written in prose.  Taylor’s efforts to tell stories in the more digested and concise format miss the mark almost every time.  One exception is “My Education in Paris” which catalogues the women who turned Taylor down without his even propositioning them:

A young Persian woman whose name meant “little white
flower that grows in the desert” – at least that’s what she
told me and I wanted to believe her – said she wouldn’t
sleep with me because I was too old.

I was 22 and I hadn’t asked her either.

A French woman I did ask said she was very pleased but she preferred women.

Wherever Taylor uses this self-effacing humor he makes an impressive connection to the reader that is personal and unpretentious, and is as memorable as his anecdotes in prose.  Unfortunately, the bulk of his verse is not nearly vivid enough to stand out for either its observation or its construction.

*


District & Circle

Friday, September 15th, 2006

by Seamus Heaney
Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2006
Reviewed by Matt Soucy

5_5

Work Defines

heaney cover

Though Seamus Heaney wrestles on occasion with the American and global political climate in his new book District and Circle, it is apparent to the reader, or any reader of his older work for that matter, that Heaney comes from a very far off place with little identity in the 2006 United States. There is common ground to be found, however, from individual to individual, especially in relation to timeless human experiences like longing and manual labor. From this come the strengths and weaknesses of this set of poems.

The book opens with Heaney’s acknowledgment of his lost world of labor and personal industry.  In ‘The Turnip Snedder,’ the world of “bare hands / and cast iron” is mutilated gorgeously into shining pulp.  The ensuing poems read like lamentations that are nearly impossible to relate to unless you’re an elderly Irishman; however, the reader is unwittingly transitioned into recognition of the current condition of war and the sad similarities that mark every era. “The Aerodrome” reflects back on a bygone airstrip where once a son and mother waited for a father to come back from war.  The poem concludes:

If self is a location, so is love
Bearing taken, markings, cardinal points,
Options, obstinacies, dug heels, and distance,
Here and there and now and then, a stance.

These lines emphasize the role of the individual and individual pressures in the midst of global chaos. Certain human experiences, it seems, are timeless. “Anything Can Happen” takes this from more of a current-events standpoint, referring to 9/11 while comparing such shocking acts to the unexpected wrath of Jupiter, the Atlantic to the River Styx, and the United States to the ruling classes of 2000 years ago.

As the book progresses there is a feeling of being mired in a past that is beautiful, but is certainly being viewed rather than felt. Unfortunately the poem “District and Circle” gives nothing much better than a great book title.  Having ridden on District and Circle, I can report that the Underground experience Heaney describes is accurate. The most attractive poems are about working and labor; although the tools and the means have changed, anyone with the stresses and satisfactions of hard labor in their bones will at least be able to sympathize with them. “Sugan,” for example, isn’t quite Frost’s “Two Tramps in Mud Time,” but validates in the same way:

The fluster of that soft supply and feed -
Hay being coaxed in handfuls from a ruck,
Paid out to be taken in furl and swivel,
Turned and tightened, rickety-rope, to rope -

District and Circle remains knee-deep in reminiscence until the final 20 pages, which start with “The Tollund Man in Springtime.”  This poem is the book’s redemption point.  Without explanation, it justifies each poem in the book no matter how distant or obscure.  It begins:

Into your virtual city I’ll have passed
Unregistered by scans, screens, hidden eyes,
Lapping myself in time, an absorbed face
Coming and going, neither god nor ghost,
Not at odds or at one, but simply lost

The narrator views himself as a man alive in the wrong time, something he describes with both real humor and feelings of tragedy.  He associates himself more with the earth than with modern day society and lets the reader know that if he or she can’t get that, they can piss off.

After continued human/nature metaphor and confusion, District and Circle revisits the favored theme of manual labor and the joys and sorrows of lives constricted and defined by work. Finally, it seems that the poet does want to give some credit to the transcendent experience of art and the depth of human life in “The Birch Grove,” “Cavafy,” and the wonderful closer, “The Blackbird of Glanmore.” If the reader is not already familiar with Heaney’s past work, this book will take some effort to love.  However, a few close readings and special attention to its half-dozen gems will show the reader a tight, purposeful book of poetry that is as deep as it is sweet.

*