Posts Tagged ‘Matthew Zapruder’

Come on All You Ghosts

Sunday, October 24th, 2010

by Matthew Zapruder
Copper Canyon Press 2010
Reviewed by Kathleen Rooney

8_5

“…a little digital hope.”

zapruder ghosts cover“Growth is always loss.” So says psychologist James Hillman in his book We’ve Had a Hundred Years of Psychotherapy and the World’s Getting Worse. His statement is probably pretty true in general, but it also seems particularly applicable to Matthew Zapruder’s third collection, Come On  All You Ghosts. Because what Hillman also means is “The imagination changes.”  Yes. Zapruder’s hip, lyrical imagination, the one that powered his first two books, American Linden and The Pajamaist, is still in force here, but it is different: older and not necessarily wiser, per se, but even more open than before. The speaker of these poems admits he is no longer young, but he remembers that he once was, and he writes of those who still are, speculating in the poem “Global Warming”: “The young. / Maybe they’ll let us be in their dreams.” Meanwhile, he acknowledges that he is becoming, or has become, one of the “people of middle/indeterminate age” of whom he also writes.

The edgy and Post-Avant sensibilities for which Zapruder has come to be known are still present as well, but they have been tempered with elegy and aging. The book is in large part “about” the biggest loss of all: death, including those of the poet’s father, of David Foster Wallace, of Robert Creeley, of Kenneth Koch and numerous others. But the collection is also about a loss of certainty, and a shift to an older perspective in which the observer gets stripped of his youthful confidence, thereby becoming better able, as he puts it in the poem “Pocket,” to try “standing in an actual stance of mystery / and not knowing towards the world.”

Zapruder begins one of the book’s most lovely and representative poems, “Grace Paley,” with the blunt statement that “People say they don’t understand poetry,” then continues, “Meaning how must we proceed.” Zapruder proceeds with a graceful movement back and forth between the past of his youth, and the present of his middle-age. Here is a lengthy passage, but the length is necessary to capture the sense of motion, of growth and loss:

                             I was thirteen, Earth
was a couch, without any irritable reaching
after fact or reason I placed thousands of
Sweet Tarts into my mouth. Five years
later someone said they saw Diane P.
kissing a girl in a car, and they punched
the window on the passenger side
in and I laughed, and it’s all been as
people say downhill from there, meaning
until this moment I have been coasting,
but from this one forward Grace I vow
I shall coast no more.

This section is typical of the gentle slaloming feeling—inevitable, never forced—that Zapruder’s poems have as they slide toward conclusions that are surprising, but apt.

Other reviews have already said that these poems are beautiful, and they are. As in his previous books, Zapruder delivers erudite descriptions of such things as “the hoarse glassy call / of the black American crow” and a colleague’s desk, which “is a medium-sized wooden lake / on which float two staplers.” He sounds like a discerning critic—a refined reviewer of life itself—when he observes in the poem “Prelude” that Diet Coke:

                                        …tastes
like nothing plus the idea of chocolate,
or an acquaintance of chocolate
speaking fondly of certain times
it and chocolate had spoken of nothing,
or nothing remembering a field
in which it once ate the most wondrous
sandwich of ham and rustic chambered cheese
yet still wished for a piece of chocolate
before the lone walk back through
the corn then the darkening forest
to the disappointing village and its super
creepy bed and breakfast.

At the same time, though, these poems also wonder what the point of any of this—of beauty, of thinking, of writing poems, of living, etc.—really is.  

In “You Have Astounding Cosmic News,” for instance, he writes, in an ostensible open letter to sociologists, “we’ve been conducting field experiments into our private thoughts. One / faction next to the soul shaped watercooler wonders whether / there’s any reason at all to remember the feeling of being a child.” These are thoughtful poems, which is to say they are poems in which the speaker frequently mentions his own act of thinking, declaring at one point, “I am getting ready to have important thoughts,” and at another, “I see sad crushed plastic / everywhere and put / some thoughts composed / of words that do not / belong together / together and feel / a little digital hope.” And, perhaps in keeping with his shift from a youthful knowing to an older wondering, as he thinks about his thoughts, they become less and less familiar. “When I think very hard / about my thoughts,” he writes, “they seem / to me to be very small horses / attached to invisible reins / attached to facts.”

Throughout the collection, Zapruder’s poetic persona seems concerned with its own authority: What can he say? What should he be saying? Plenty of poems and poets have covered this turf, with the more language-y ones tending to conclude that there is little to no such authority to begin with—that words inevitably fail, that communication is bound to break down. Yet while Zapruder’s poems are playful and funny, he makes it clear he’s not just playing around. His poems posit that something is at stake, or at least that something ought to be. And the book, though not linked together with any overall story or clearcut throughline, does suggest an arc, the speaker starting out with these doubts, grappling with them, and concluding: yes, I can make meaning and I can make it in such a way that this meaning can keep being made after I am gone. Communication can, does, and should occur. In a way, Come On All You Ghosts poses, wrestles directly and indirectly with, and finally answers yes to the question of whether poetry can matter.

Zapruder ends the book with the 14-page title poem whose last stanza expresses a satisfaction of sorts about what he—as a person and as a poet—is trying to do, and that when it’s his turn to become a ghost himself, he will:

…have done my best to leave

behind this machine
anyone with a mind
who cares can enter.

*


Zapruder tour dates

Monday, October 11th, 2010

Matthew Zapruder is hitting the road in support of his soon-to-be-released book, Come On All You Ghosts (Copper Canyon Press).  Check him out.

Friday, October 8th, Open Books, 2414 N. 45th St. Seattle, WA, 7:30pmbook2-e1281730456803

Saturday, October 9th, Believer/McSweeney’s Litcrawl event, Heart Wine Bar, 1270 Valencia Street, San Francisco, 8:30pm

Sunday, October 24th, Poetry Flash Reading, Diesel Bookstore, 5433 College Avenue, Oakland, CA, 3pm (with Michael Earl Craig and Steve Healey)

Monday, October 25th, Sacramento Poetry Center, 1719 25th St., Sacramento CA, 7:30pm (with Michael Earl Craig and Graham Foust)

Wednesday, November 3rd, Missouri Valley Reading Series, University of Nebraska at Omaha

Friday, December 3rd, Studio One Reading Series, 365 45th St, Oakland (between Broadway and Telegraph, MacArthur BART), 7pm (with Robert Hass)

–Steven Karl


State of the Union

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

Edited by Joshua Beckman & Matthew Zapruder
Wave Books 2008
Reviewed by John Deming

8

Fundamentals

state of the unionThom Gunn died on April 25, 2004, three days before photos of torture from Abu-Ghraib were revealed. At the time, Osama bin Laden was nowhere in sight, the twin towers were a crushing memory, American soldiers labored in Iraq despite a year-old presidential declaration of “mission-accomplished,” and terrorists bred terrorists all the while. In his elegy “For Thom Gunn,” poet Garrett Caples laments, “i’m sorry you had to die a time when evil’s got this country by the balls…”

Some things have changed since 2004, and many haven’t. State of the Union, a timely collection of fifty contemporary “political” poems edited by Joshua Beckman and Matthew Zapruder, chronicles the deeply-nuanced frustration and cynicism—as well as the procreant urge towards hope—that have resulted from life during the Bush administration.

Poet Philip Levine once remarked that every poem is a political poem, because “telling the truth is a political act.” The poems in State of the Union are overtly political in varying degrees. Some name names; Matthew Rohrer’s aggressive “Elementary Science for Dick Cheney” is a humble chat about animals and ethics until it references Cheney’s “artificial heart” and finally informs the vice president, “it is a good thing / to watch you die.”

Yet many of the best poems in this book are more subtle. Nick Flynn’s “Imagination,” a standout, uses only six spare couplets and concludes with suggestive force: “that // war, say, jesus / did we really just make it all up?” Politicians are often criticized for preaching lofty ideals without laying a specific groundwork for success; these lines suggest that imagination often precedes action, for better or for worse.

If some of the voices in Union are frustrated, angry, even cynical, they are not absent hope. They embody the abstract perceptions of a swath of (albeit, liberal-minded) Americans, and in doing so, present a climate of fear, deception and violence. The very notions of virtue and clarity become suspect; in “Kettle,” Mary Ruefle muses that perfectly clear minds were behind the Holocaust, that “the killers/were given advice, stay calm, lean forward,/do what you have to do with a clear mind.” Nonetheless, virtue and clarity are significant, even while abstract; a climate of horror exists as counterpoint to some kind of living ideal, real or imagined.  

If the economy settles itself, the war in Iraq ends with grace, Osama bin Laden is captured and all is made right in the land, this book will serve as a useful reminder of an uneasy era; if not, all the same. The poems that name names will inevitably seem dated either way, will seem emblematic of a specific era—but as the title indicates, perhaps that is the aim. When Thom Gunn died, the country was less than six months away from re-electing George W. Bush. Now we go again. If every poem is a political act, then what is true of all good poetry is true of good political poems, of good and bad political acts and intentions: they are true. There are more fundamental metaphors at work.

*


The Pajamaist

Monday, January 29th, 2007

by Matthew Zapruder
Copper Canyon Press 2006
Reviewed by Melinda Wilson

7.5 of 10 stars

All That We See or Seem

the pajamistIf you’re wondering what a “pajamaist” is I can tell you for sure that it is a kind of grand metaphor; it has to be, as Matthew Zapruder makes the following important disclosure early on in the titular poem:

 

When I sleep I don’t wear pajamas. I prefer to sleep naked,
and thrash the bedsheets around until they wrap me in a
protective covering with only my head and feet exposed.

For Zapruder the entrance to a poem is never problematic. He knows how to engage—an essential poetic tool that even some “essential” writers lack. Zapruder knows how to get into a poem and to bring the reader with him.  The book title alone hooks the reader and we’re compelled to read on to find out more. While we’re not always rewarded with clear-cut answers, the first poem in the book, “Dream Job,” provides excellent opening lines that seem fitting for a pajamaist:

Today abstracted
as a glass of milk
forgotten by a kid who went
into this interminable
rain to play…

A dreamlike mood is set, already we’re mixed up in dreamlike imagery, an unstable world in which we can be sure of nothing but Zapruder’s  “interminable.” “The Pajamaist,” we learn later in the book, is the title of a novel the poet writes in a dream; the above lines are a perfect introduction to a book in which everyone suffers, in which dreaming, reality, and the imagination are the blurred antidote to that suffering.

Sometimes Zapruder engages by asking questions of the reader, and of a mysterious companion he is writing to or about. This tactic is employed throughout “Twenty Poems for Noelle,” a poem in twenty untitled sections that invoke “Noelle” as an anchor for the collection. Early in the book, “First Time, Long Time” begins:

Those big oily birds cleaning
their feathers on the roof,
what are they called?

I have no idea, but I sure as hell want to find out too. Again though, the poem becomes less about identifying a specific genus of bird; it presents a meditative, cautious narrator, perplexed by everything surrounding him. The poem seeks to formulate a new perspective, a dream-like lens through which to view the earth.

“Canada” provides yet another example of a poem successfully and beautifully launched. “By Canada I have always been fascinated. / All that snow and acquiescing.” The second line here is perhaps the most striking in the book and certainly my personal favorite, a perfect synthesis of sound and significance. Zapruder repeats the word Canada several times throughout the poem. Repetition can be a slippery slope that frustrates the reader with its sentimentality; Zapruder manages to romanticize it in a satisfying way:

In Canada the leaves are falling.
When they do each one rustles
maybe to the white-tailed deer
of sadness…

Zapruder has a way of working up to endings that are on the brink of falling victim to the trap of sentimentality, but rather achieve a small finality feeling more like an inevitability than an engineered tearjerker.

Parts two and three of the book—“Twenty Poems for Noelle” and “The Pajamaist,” respectively—focus on a universal cell of suffering. “Twenty Poems for Noelle” seems identifiable as a post 9-11 mindset. “The Pajamaist” is centered on a dream in which the narrator is writing a novel called “The Pajamaist.” In the novel, a cure for suffering has been discovered: displacing suffering, and hiring the pajamaist to suffer for you.

Though suffering is an obviously large and complex subject (one that some may deem cliché, especially when addressed within a poem) and a cure for suffering is an idealist notion even in a dream, Zapruder’s lengthy title poem is oddly entertaining and simultaneously melancholic. “We just think suffering hurts less in sleep because / we are sleeping.” In this highly imaginative poem there is a pajamaist who works as a “sufferer,” meaning that he lets others transfer their suffering to him using “pajama’s little helper” or a little blue pill so that they may suffer less.

Also there is an investigator that probes a case of odd spikes in suffering graphs that leads him to said pajamaist. I should remind you as well that all of this takes place in a dream that the narrator of the poem (also the pajamaist? Naked poet?) dreams. Ten different types of suffering are aptly identified for us as well, making sure not to leave out “the purely physical.” The notion of using a pill/person to limit suffering makes “The Pajamaist” reminiscent of Don Delillo’s novel White Noise, in which a pill is marketed as a cure for the fear of death; this was for me a positive association, especially when strange levels of government become involved.

Lots of “suffering.” Somehow though the book remains somber while never becoming maudlin. As Zapruder knows how to begin poems, he is also skilled at finishing them, often times on upbeat and inspiring notes. An example of such a brilliant ending is found in “Tonight You’ll Be Able”:

…Ask yourself
what would I do if I knew I could
not fail.

Sounds like fantastic advice, amplified by his pristine enjambment. Zapruder often leaves out many forms of punctuation in his poems which creates a natural feeling of necessity and immediacy. Moreover, Zapruder ends this collection with the idea of new beginnings, opportunities, and possibilities. The positive energy that ends the book is moving and makes clear that anything—a dream, a death, a vision of reality, a moment’s suffering—can be “both breakable and strong.”

*